ext_2103 (
kudra2324.livejournal.com
) wrote
in
trinityofone
2006-08-09 04:07 am (UTC)
no subject
ah, true. i think as long as one mentions the necessity of glitter in the statement, one is save with POTC2, though.
um, unless samuel l. jackson wears glitter? i'm not sure how i'd feel about that.
(
81 comments
)
Post a comment in response:
From:
Anonymous
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
OpenID
Identity URL:
Log in?
Dreamwidth account
Account name
Password
Log in?
If you don't have an account you can
create one now
.
Subject
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
Formatting type
Casual HTML
Markdown
Raw HTML
Rich Text Editor
Message
[
Home
|
Post Entry
|
Log in
|
Search
|
Browse Options
|
Site Map
]
no subject
um, unless samuel l. jackson wears glitter? i'm not sure how i'd feel about that.