Why is SGA fandom so segregated?
Jul. 13th, 2006 11:36 amI am incredibly, incredibly tired today. I was exhausted yesterday, and couldn't even make it through The Daily Show before I crashed. This is bad. I thought I was adjusting to my new work schedule, but I guess I'm not. Is there any way to train yourself to need less sleep?
One thing that has almost kept me energized has been the response to the SGA Bulwer-Lytton Contest. There are so many awesome and hysterical entries, it's going to be killer to choose. So I think I'll pick my--15? Is that how many entries an LJ poll allows?--my 15 or so favorites and let people vote on the Grand Prize Winner. Unless anybody has wild objections, I'll put that up tomorrow.
Like I said, the response has been incredible, and I've seen some new names (by which I mean: people I don't know, even by association, not "people who don't usually comment here"), which is always cool. But--and please correct me if I'm wrong--I still seem to be attracting mostly McKay/Sheppard people, or at least mostly slash people. Which in general makes sense, because hey, I write McKay/Sheppard, I talk about McKay/Sheppard, most of my friends are into McKay/Sheppard. As far as I'm concerned, McKay/Sheppard is for yay.
BUT. I like other pairings, too (my other fandom interest could possibly be described as McKay/women), and I think at least a little cross-pairing pollination is to be encouraged. My last fandom was BtVS/AtS, and it was wild, man. I mean, I started out a Spuffy shipper (Shut up! Their love was
Why is SGA so much more segregated? I mean, I don't think this is entirely a bad thing--I don't want my flist flooded with Sheppard/Weir stories, and I doubt the Sheppard/Weir shippers want a gazillion McKay/Sheppard stories on their friends pages, either. But is it just me, or is it extremely hard to organize activities that include all sides of fandom? Take
(Speaking of one nice bit of pairing diversity, I really loved this
Anyway, the Bulwer-Lytton thing is different, because of course it is not pairing-centric: it's mostly about mocking style and usage, although certain tropes have been fun to mock, too. It's about bad writing, but it's also about amusing and clever writing, and seeing what you can do in the space of a sentence. That's something everybody can appreciate, right?
So I guess what I'm wondering is, where are the het shippers? (Again, please correct me if they're around and I've just been too dumb to notice.) And I just don't mean, why aren't they here, responding to this--what is here is awesome, and I'm not like, demanding more people participate, omg. I just mean, I've been in this fandom for almost a year now--how have we managed not to interact at all? Of course, part of this may be me--I'm certainly not trolling
Maybe it's just that we have a situation that's more like X-Files fandom than Buffydom. Back in the old days, I was rabid about MSR, and I just didn't go anywhere near the slash. (Or Scully/Skinner, or whatever else there was.) I can't remember very well, but I think I was actively afraid of those unfamiliar corners of the net, and that included any of the projects "those people" may have been involved in. Of course, I think this may have had MUCH more to do with the fact that I was 14 than with my shipping preferences, but could there possibly be some connection? What I'd like to know is, do most people on the het end of fandom see even a name associated with slash and immediately go, "Avoid! Avoid! Avoid!"? Which, I hasten to say, would be totally their right. But I realize, I don't even know anyone over there that I could ask.
I'm not saying that there needs to be some sort of cross-ship dialogue, because I think those things tend to end in angry glaring at best. Possibly, just ignoring each other is the best way to avoid conflict, and I'm all for avoiding conflict. I'm just surprised there isn't some sort of neutral zone, some shaded area at the center of the Giant Venn Diagram of Fandom Life. Why do you think that is?
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-13 06:53 pm (UTC)If they'd stayed static, with Willow mooning over Xander, who mooned over Buffy, who mooned over Angel, for SEVEN YEARS, I bet BTVS fandom would be just as codified as most other fandoms are. You'd have your Willow/Xander shippers vs. Xander/Buffy shippers vs. Buffy/Angel shippers and that would be *it*, you know?
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-13 06:57 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-13 06:58 pm (UTC)I think that's also the reason why there's much more cross-pollination with the Cadman and Teyly het-shippers -- she's a mch more popular and accepted character. I can think of quite a few slashers who have also written Teyla or Cadman with one of the boys, or Teyla threesomes, why I couldn't think of any Elizabeth stories at all (partly because I tend to avoid those like the plague -- might as well be honest about my tiny part in the great fandom divide).
I also think the het shippers are just that much more rare in this fandom than in many others, because there are too few awesome female characters who also have UST with the boys -- Teyla/Ronon, the best-represented het pairing as far as I know, is also the only one I can see at all in this show. It's far easier to ship the women of Buffy or Farscape, IMO.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-13 06:59 pm (UTC)Porn? One might have to throw in porn vs. romance as another factor, because I can't stomach certain characterizations of John bowing to a romance plot, het or slash, while I'm sure some people wouldn't care for my fics where it's forget the fingers let's get the sex over with already.
Go Rodney. I'd also like to put forth the theory that Rodney is the neutral zone, all on his own. ^^ I dunno, how many of us slashers are all for the Rodney/Teyla? Is it just me? John as a character seems to be polarizing, to say the least.
Previous fandoms. HP. Nuff said.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-13 07:00 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-13 07:02 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-13 07:03 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-13 07:04 pm (UTC)But don't you think
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-13 07:07 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-13 07:07 pm (UTC)I just wrote my first Atlantis slash, and it did happen to be John/Rodney because it fit the subject matter. However, in SGA, as in Star Trek, I have no real "OTP".
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-13 07:09 pm (UTC)I was (am?) in Harry Potter, too, which is the complete opposite - most mix and match fandom ever, and though some people are rabid shippers, most people are like, eh, she works with more than one person.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-13 07:09 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-13 07:11 pm (UTC)The difference is Joss Whedon: Buffy and Firefly both had female characters that felt like people, not like "women written by men". There was more there to latch on to and play with.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-13 07:12 pm (UTC)I must disagree. One of the problems I've had with the Sheppard/Weir I've run across is that a lot of them range from Rodney-neutral to actively anti-Rodney. Intellectually I have no problem with that -- heaven knows he's not the *easiest* guy around -- but emotionally I may, perhaps, be a wee bit invested. *holds fingers up close together* ahem.
I think John is polarizing in that different fan groups are struggling for his affections, but Rodney is polarizing in love him/hate him kind of way.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-13 07:12 pm (UTC)(Which is funny to me, because in Due South where for YEARS it seemed like people never wrote anything but their one OTP *ever*, Res was part of the first group of people who started being all bifictional-- Ray/Ray and Turnbull/Kowalski and Ray/Ray/Thatcher and all kinds of stuff.)
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-13 07:16 pm (UTC)Hm, but is that really the case on SGA? Not that it's the bestest most feminist show ever, but we know far more about Elizabeth's background and life on Earth, for instance, than we do about John's. And I think Teyla is a very strong character.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-13 07:18 pm (UTC)I think that it might have to do currently with the amount of time that both have been airing. Stargate Atlantis is still fairly new while Buffy/Angel have been on for years; people have been Buffy-fans for a while longer than SGA-fans. They've had time to write/read, find pairings and characters they prefer. Challenges and groups have formed for seasons, people that like Willow might have been het writers from her few seasons of hetro-ness and then stuck with her when she became a couple with Tara, crossing into the slash genre for example.
There’s more canon to mess around with I guess is what I’m getting at.
Which reminds me of my other point for why SGA lacks variety, there haven’t been a lot of “new” characters. We have the main players and then some minor characters that have stuck around for an episode maybe two before they're totally left behind in canon. Though I suppose you could do crossover with SG-1 if you needed more characters, but I digress.
There's also the fact that people like seeing certain characters together and haven't likened to the idea of dipping their toe in a different pond yet.
I know I tend to reluctantly read other pairings but generally stick pretty much with John and Rodney. Though I still tend to read slash even then, Rodney and Ronon or "McShep" with Beckett.
I'm not sure if it's just because I just don't read het that much anymore or if it's just because the only strong female characters we have in SGA are Elizabeth and Teyla, neither of which who I care to read paired with the characters I'm generally interested in reading about. I'm not sure if that's just me or other people haven't warmed up to Weir and Teyla as well. (It's like I don't mind them being a supporting character in the story---I actually like it but as neither is a favorite I don't look out for stories about them.)
Which isn't to say I would be averse to seeing some het, if it's well written I'm up for anything.
So maybe all we need is time and a few new characters (Chuck and Lorne screen time are never bad! *grins*), but I like the idea of a neutral zone for just sharing the fandom love. *grins* Maybe I'll have to go check out john_elizabeth and see if they're hot tub is as cool as ours?
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-13 07:19 pm (UTC)Do you think it's a function of characterization? Well, not "are we watching the same show" because that's thorny and I'm not real sure about the show writers sometimes... but more in the sense that we use certain characters to fulfill certain plot functions, and that might run counter to how other people use them?
Like, to pull out an untested hypothetical, is using Rodney as comic relief different in a het fic than a slash fic? Even if he's not involved in the main pairing? I dunno, just thinking aloud.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-13 07:25 pm (UTC)Pardon my incoherence, I haven't slept for about40 hours
Date: 2006-07-13 07:27 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-13 07:27 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-13 07:28 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-13 07:30 pm (UTC)But yes, I do think there are interesting female characters on SGA. I'd include Cadman in there, too.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-13 07:30 pm (UTC)The LJ thing, though, that's interesting. I find the coolest John/Elizabeth off the grid, as it were. I despair of a better way of finding them.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-13 07:32 pm (UTC)