(no subject)
Aug. 24th, 2008 04:55 pm1. Character bashing is never a good idea. It’s just…tacky. And I’m not saying, “Don’t say anything negative!” I don’t think it’s unreasonable to point out the difference between saying, “What Character X did there bugged me, it was stupid” and “Character X is a stupid bitch.”
2. Character bashing for the “preservation” of a ship is an even worse idea. Besides being petty and ugly, it’s just plain unnecessary. The existence of Character X or Character X’s relationship with Character Y doesn’t actually stop anyone from writing fic about Character Y and Character Z screwing each other seven ways from Sunday. And even if Character X and Character Y get married in canon and have 27 babies, that shouldn’t stop anyone from writing AU fic where Character Y and Character Z screw seven ways from Sunday, or non-AU fic where Y gets a babysitter so Y and Z can screw some more.
3. Bashing female characters who “interfere” with slash ships is especially bothersome. First, there’s the misogyny inherent in the idea that this evil woman who’s getting between our boys must be stopped. Second, as I already said, the idea that the existence of this female character can actually interfere with what we write/draw/vid is ludicrous. Canon and fandom: these are separate spheres, guys. What we do and what TPTB do have no effect on each other whatsoever. (Okay, little effect—if TPTB suddenly turned all the characters into elves, there would be more fic where they were elves. There would also be plenty of elf-denial fic. Fandom rolls on.)
4. Personally, since I know that my slash ship is never going to happen onscreen—that none of them are (well, maybe House/Wilson. MAYBE)—I am fine with there being onscreen romances for characters, as well as offscreen ones in my head. It’s the same separate spheres idea: I like to enjoy both. Now, obviously, no one is obligated to love every single thing that happens in a show’s canon. If Zelenka died, for example—omg, would I be upset. Or, to move a little closer to what everyone knows this post is about (I am tired of being coy)—if TPTB decided that John and Rodney were no longer friends—if all of a sudden, everything onscreen suggested that they hated each other—god yes, I would be pissed. But that’s not what’s happening here. If anything, their friendship is being shown as stronger than ever. If anything, there is more glorious team love going around than there has ever been before. Which just makes everyone hating on Keller like this so much more disingenuous. We were just given an episode that was SLASH GOLD. Why can’t we focus on that, instead of being needlessly nasty about a smart, awkward, geeky, interesting female character who has the GALL to like Rodney McKay? You know, like we do.
5. I like Keller. I relate to Keller. Do you have to? No. But this outpouring of hate toward her seems to me like confirmation of what people—people with whom I usually disagree—say when they call slash fans misogynistic. When I read post after post of Keller-loathing (and I finally just stopped reading episode reactions, because in so many cases I wasn’t finding squee, but bile), it feels to me that we are hating on ourselves. That we are hating on women. I am sure you could bring me individual case after individual case that proves me wrong, but I would just like to ask all of you to think a bit before you write more about how Keller isn’t good enough for Rodney or he’d have to be mentally unhinged to like her or how she’s too whiny or awkward (and Rodney’s not?) or pushy or controlling (and John’s not?). Is it really necessary to bring her down in order to make John and Rodney love each other? No, it’s not.
6. Jennifer Keller does nothing to hurt or harm McKay/Sheppard. But I think these reactions toward her—this attitude—really does. It makes me less likely to want to participate in John/Rodney discussions or read John/Rodney fic. It takes something that’s supposed to be about love—because isn’t that what shipping is? Rooting for love? (Okay, and sex)—and makes it about knocking relationships—and people—down instead of building them up. I don’t want to be a part of that. And I would like to think we’re better than that.
2. Character bashing for the “preservation” of a ship is an even worse idea. Besides being petty and ugly, it’s just plain unnecessary. The existence of Character X or Character X’s relationship with Character Y doesn’t actually stop anyone from writing fic about Character Y and Character Z screwing each other seven ways from Sunday. And even if Character X and Character Y get married in canon and have 27 babies, that shouldn’t stop anyone from writing AU fic where Character Y and Character Z screw seven ways from Sunday, or non-AU fic where Y gets a babysitter so Y and Z can screw some more.
3. Bashing female characters who “interfere” with slash ships is especially bothersome. First, there’s the misogyny inherent in the idea that this evil woman who’s getting between our boys must be stopped. Second, as I already said, the idea that the existence of this female character can actually interfere with what we write/draw/vid is ludicrous. Canon and fandom: these are separate spheres, guys. What we do and what TPTB do have no effect on each other whatsoever. (Okay, little effect—if TPTB suddenly turned all the characters into elves, there would be more fic where they were elves. There would also be plenty of elf-denial fic. Fandom rolls on.)
4. Personally, since I know that my slash ship is never going to happen onscreen—that none of them are (well, maybe House/Wilson. MAYBE)—I am fine with there being onscreen romances for characters, as well as offscreen ones in my head. It’s the same separate spheres idea: I like to enjoy both. Now, obviously, no one is obligated to love every single thing that happens in a show’s canon. If Zelenka died, for example—omg, would I be upset. Or, to move a little closer to what everyone knows this post is about (I am tired of being coy)—if TPTB decided that John and Rodney were no longer friends—if all of a sudden, everything onscreen suggested that they hated each other—god yes, I would be pissed. But that’s not what’s happening here. If anything, their friendship is being shown as stronger than ever. If anything, there is more glorious team love going around than there has ever been before. Which just makes everyone hating on Keller like this so much more disingenuous. We were just given an episode that was SLASH GOLD. Why can’t we focus on that, instead of being needlessly nasty about a smart, awkward, geeky, interesting female character who has the GALL to like Rodney McKay? You know, like we do.
5. I like Keller. I relate to Keller. Do you have to? No. But this outpouring of hate toward her seems to me like confirmation of what people—people with whom I usually disagree—say when they call slash fans misogynistic. When I read post after post of Keller-loathing (and I finally just stopped reading episode reactions, because in so many cases I wasn’t finding squee, but bile), it feels to me that we are hating on ourselves. That we are hating on women. I am sure you could bring me individual case after individual case that proves me wrong, but I would just like to ask all of you to think a bit before you write more about how Keller isn’t good enough for Rodney or he’d have to be mentally unhinged to like her or how she’s too whiny or awkward (and Rodney’s not?) or pushy or controlling (and John’s not?). Is it really necessary to bring her down in order to make John and Rodney love each other? No, it’s not.
6. Jennifer Keller does nothing to hurt or harm McKay/Sheppard. But I think these reactions toward her—this attitude—really does. It makes me less likely to want to participate in John/Rodney discussions or read John/Rodney fic. It takes something that’s supposed to be about love—because isn’t that what shipping is? Rooting for love? (Okay, and sex)—and makes it about knocking relationships—and people—down instead of building them up. I don’t want to be a part of that. And I would like to think we’re better than that.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-25 12:04 am (UTC)I think McKay/Keller is kinda cute, actually. They're well-matched, and look like they could be friends as well as lovers.
However, in the defense of folks who don't like it, the way the ship was presented in the recent ep was weird and awkward and poorly written. Why can't the SG writers write a male/female love interest relationship *at least* as well as they write the male/female friendships on the show (not to mention the male/male friendships)?
(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-25 01:59 am (UTC)Case in Point; the Chief Medical Officer washes a mysterious sticky substance off her hands into the sink, possibly contaminating the whole water supply, and then leaves without getting herself or mysterious substance checked out, sigh. Problem is they've done this to each and every character, let's make our character stupid to move my plot along instead of thinking of up something sharper, or more well reasoned. Yes, people make stupid mistakes, and yes, this should occasionally be high lighted. But this expedition is touted to have some of the best and brightest, the mistake crutch is over used IMO. -SB
(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-25 12:04 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-25 02:47 am (UTC)That's it exactly. Keller/Ronnon were dorky, sweet, and awkward together and it was completely too cute!
And Rodney and Keller definately have way more chemistry and are nearly as dorky as Ronon and Keller, but not quite.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-25 12:09 am (UTC)But I have also been getting vibes about just how much everyone loves this episode and that makes me very excited.
I love Keller. I feel like she's a part of the team and I want the team to be happy. ALL of the team.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-25 12:15 am (UTC)If that's bashing her? Well, I don't think it is, but YMMV.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-25 12:31 am (UTC)However, I haven't in general seen people say, "I think Keller made mistakes in 'The Shrine.'" That's totally reasonable; I thought everyone came down with a chronic case of stupid in 'Coup d'Etat,' for example. It's more that people are suddenly saying (seriously emphasis on the suddenly), "I hate Keller and everything about her and everything she's done and she's clearly just John and Rodney's beard and he'd have to be stupid to like her." And that tumbles into bashing, IMO.
I should note—I am not reacting to anything you said in particular, just a lot of episode reactions and posts in general. If anyone feels singled out, that's not my intent, and I am sorry.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-25 12:18 am (UTC)Misogyny or misplaced jealousy is a sucky reason for disliking a character, but sometimes a character will tank with some viewers for various reasons that aren't necessarily about projection.
But I'm glad you like the character, and I'm glad the shows direction is working out for you because I wouldn't want anyone to lose their enjoyment over something. Keep the squee alive. :)
(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-25 12:18 am (UTC)WAIT, WAIT! People are upset about stuff in that ep? Thinking it *wasn't* slash gold??? I am confused. I thought that was one of the slashiest eps I've ever seen! Whoa, dude.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-25 12:24 am (UTC)So I'm a positivist. So sue me.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-25 12:33 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-25 12:25 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-25 12:26 am (UTC)I've been thinking the same sort of thing - but I've not had the time or the eloquence to put it down in words. So, thanks, Trin!
(Also - it was a bit heavy-handed, to be fair, but it's something I can equate to the wobbliness of early Jack/Ianto in Torchwood Season One. I see exactly same thing with McKay/Keller. Nothing for, like, 7 episodes and then BAM! Stopwatch porn. I feel like saying to the SGA fans: What are you, new? It's the major problem with multiple writers, at the end of the day, it's always going to happen unless they all collaborate over what's happening in each other's episodes)
(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-25 12:36 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-25 12:29 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-25 12:34 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-25 12:36 am (UTC)also: elf-denial. awesome.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-25 12:47 am (UTC)It annoys me to no end that female characters on SGA have regularly been given such hackneyed scripts, Keller most especially of late. It's like she's caught in some weird tug-of-war between writers...
Re: the Shrine? as someone else (way smarter than me) pointed out? When Rodney made his declaration to Keller? it was way early in his disintegration... whereas his "calling out" to John happened much later...after he forgot he wasn't supposed to be "gay". =)
While mostly I'm a McShep OTP'er? I ultimately am ONLY gonna get that from fanfic... certainly NOT the show.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-25 01:03 am (UTC)Everyone gets hackneyed scripts. It could be argued that the women are in general written less well than the men, but I don't think that justifies so much negativity. I mean, you don't see hate like what's been going around for Lorne, and he's written pretty shoddily. (Painting, WTF?)
Re: the Shrine? as someone else (way smarter than me) pointed out? When Rodney made his declaration to Keller? it was way early in his disintegration... whereas his "calling out" to John happened much later...after he forgot he wasn't supposed to be "gay".
I think whoever said that was joking. It's a funny joke. But the idea of taking it seriously bothers me. You could just as easily argue that Rodney loved Jennifer when he was more in his right mind, and only went to John when he wasn't. I know you're not deliberately doing so, but once again this is a (minor) example of bringing one character/relationship down to boost another one up. All I'm saying is, it makes me uncomfortable. :\
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-25 12:48 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-25 12:56 am (UTC)people think their slash should be *easy* - come on, folks, we can work with this! That's why it's called subtext, 'kay?
Hee! Yes. I mean, I would love to live in a world in which gay relationships are just as likely to happen on TV as straight ones—and maybe we will someday soon! But for now, realistically, let's keep things...well, realistic. SGA is not going to be the show to go there, it's just not that cool. But its subtext is glorious.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-25 01:05 am (UTC)#4 is what really gets me. There's no way we're going to get Rodney and John getting engaged, snogging, and flying off into the sunset in a puddle jumper ala the end of Grease on the show. Sadly ;)
Besides, we all know what's *really* going on. Right? I mean, giving your best mate your leather jacket to wear while you sit outside drinking beer in the middle of the night actually means that they're engaged in some Pegasus Galaxy cultures. And that's the way they show how much they care about each other.
Also, if we get more shots of either John or Rodney snogging people, I'm all for it.
Also, also, it's possible to be in love with different people at the same time for different reasons.
And I totally adore Keller, and think her & Rodney are cute together. I'm especially for it if we get more jealous John. ;)
(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-25 03:58 am (UTC)However, I challenge anyone and everyone to write that fic! ;-)
if we get more shots of either John or Rodney snogging people, I'm all for it.
Yes, exactly! How is there any bad there? More kissing and hugging in general, I say.
it's possible to be in love with different people at the same time for different reasons.
Yes again! Rodney's feelings for Jennifer do not in any way diminish his feelings for John. And, you know, combined with what you said about jealous!John... I actually have this vague idea where John sees what's going on between Rodney and Jennifer, and he fights with himself because he knows that Rodney doesn't really have enough confidence to pursue it, doesn't think Jennifer would react favorably. But John knows—and is still the only one who knows—that Rodney and Jennifer were together in the alternate timeline, so finally he decides to do the right thing and come clean. So Rodney and Jennifer get together and are very happy and John's all stiff-upper-lip and resigned to being Cool Uncle John and whatnot.
But then they all move to Berkeley and embrace polyamory and live happily ever after. Or something.
See? So many possibilities!
(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-25 01:06 am (UTC)But. That has nothing to do with the potential relationship. If they make it work...well, we'll see. I'm reserving judgment on that one.
And yes--pure slash gold, this ep. Just wonderful.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-25 01:24 am (UTC)I think she's poorly written
More so than anyone else? People keep saying this, but I think she's better fleshed out than a lot of characters people love. (Lorne! Chuck! I could go on.)
unqualified to be the CMO
Why? What has she done that suggests she's unqualified? She hasn't created a retrovirus that was morally incredibly iffy and also resulted in John turning into a bug, like Carson did.
inconsistent
How so? I can't think of an example.
willing to let a patient die because she's too bullheaded to think something might work that didn't come from her or her ideas
To me, it seemed like she was unwilling to risk her patient's life for something that—if it worked—would only grant him a 24-hour stay of execution. Instead, she was still trying to come up with a permanent solution.
I just feel like a lot of people's reasoning for disliking Keller has more to do with ingrained ideas about gender roles or knee-jerk reactions to her "coming between" Rodney and John. I'm not saying this is the case for you. I just wish everyone would pause and reconsider for a moment where some of these reactions might be coming from.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-25 01:11 am (UTC)I also really like Keller and think it's nice to see Rodney have feelings for her. I mean, he and she are friends, right? Men and women are allowed to be good friends and love each other dearly without it fucking up their romantic relationships. And plenty of queer people have dated friends as beards for their real relationships.
But as to the rest of your post, YES. It's something I've been trying to work against in Due South for the last several *years*. The female characters on the show are awesomely lovable and respectable in their own ways (depending on the writer) and are uniformly victims of shoddy writing. They have a will, they have priorities, they have their own lives totally apart from the two male leads. So they can totally go off and do things THEY want to do that leave the guys free to be slashed silly. It isn't a problem. *g*
*hides from reading more ep reviews*
(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-25 01:57 am (UTC)Not to get all crankypants on you, but dismissing Jennifer as Rodney's beard kinda bugs me, too. It reduces her to a prop. I don't think we need to do that to rejoice in slashy goodness, either.
Digging the icon, though. :)
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-25 01:33 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-25 01:35 am (UTC)I haven't done an episode review yet, but my encapsulated view is pretty much that I have no problem with Jennifer as a person. I have a bit of a problem with TPTB because we've already seenthe Rodney/Katie, and I was a huge fan of the Ronon/Jennifer before there even was Ronon/Jennifer. Also, I would like it to be Ronon's turn for a storyline that exceeds, "Hey, my people kinda suck now and I am suffering at the hands of a Wraith." (Haha, see my pun there? It was incredibly cheap. Sorry.) :P I think I just got incredibly attached to the idea of seeing his softer side on Atlantis. Alas.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-25 02:06 am (UTC)I wish Ronon could be given more diverse storylines, in general (Teyla, too). I'm overjoyed at the idea of Rodney canonically getting some love that doesn't end ridiculously, though. I think I've just decided that Ronon and Elizabeth had a secret passion which has had several roadblocks tragically thrust in its path, but that Ronon hasn't given up—will never give up— Someone should write this for me, don't you think? ;-)
(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-25 01:41 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-25 02:12 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-25 02:48 am (UTC)You've hit it on the head.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-25 03:28 am (UTC)And, especially in regards to point six? I know that I, personally, stopped readng all tags for this episode, because the of the bashing in the first few I was unlucky enough to stumble upon.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-25 10:41 am (UTC)Me, too. I feel like I need to run them through a filter of someone who reads them for me and decides 'okay, you won't want to read this one,' 'you can read this one.'
(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-25 04:34 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-25 05:42 am (UTC)*claps wildly*
A big OMG!YES to everything you said. Canon never really gets in the way of fandom. If anything it makes for even more interesting written fic in the way that authors go over, around and through canon to write their stories.
*beams at you and sticks a gold star to your forehead for being ultra-awesome*