Time travel + Going into books
Oct. 6th, 2008 11:46 amTwo book questions for you today inspired by my desire to avoid the stuff I need to be doing:
1. I love time travel books and am always interested in recommendations in general, but right now I am specifically looking for books where characters from the past come forward to the (relative) present. Can anybody think of any?
2. I got way too much guilty pleasure out of the recent BBC miniseries Lost in Austen. It made me want to try other books (or other media?) that involve characters going into books or book characters coming out of them. I can only think of three others:
a. The Thursday Next series by Jasper Fforde (meh)
b. Seducing Mr. Darcy by Gwyn Cready (appallingly awful)
c. Travel Far, Pay No Fare by Anne Lindbergh (absolutely delightful and sadly under-recognized YA book that I heartily recommend to everybody)
I know there must be others. Can you help me find them?
*goes back to not filling out unemployment paperwork, la la la*
1. I love time travel books and am always interested in recommendations in general, but right now I am specifically looking for books where characters from the past come forward to the (relative) present. Can anybody think of any?
2. I got way too much guilty pleasure out of the recent BBC miniseries Lost in Austen. It made me want to try other books (or other media?) that involve characters going into books or book characters coming out of them. I can only think of three others:
a. The Thursday Next series by Jasper Fforde (meh)
b. Seducing Mr. Darcy by Gwyn Cready (appallingly awful)
c. Travel Far, Pay No Fare by Anne Lindbergh (absolutely delightful and sadly under-recognized YA book that I heartily recommend to everybody)
I know there must be others. Can you help me find them?
*goes back to not filling out unemployment paperwork, la la la*
(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-06 07:03 pm (UTC)2) Inkheart, a children's book, has some of this idea, I think. (I confess I only know about it because there's a movie coming out starring Brendan Fraiser. Don't judge me!) Of course, there's always "Pleasantville," the movie version of this idea.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-06 07:14 pm (UTC)Inkheart I tried to read a while back and was terribly bored. Maybe I should give it another shot? :\
And I didn't think of Pleasantville, but you're right, that does fit!
(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-06 07:19 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-06 07:04 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-06 07:05 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-06 07:07 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-06 07:15 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-06 07:20 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-06 07:21 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-06 08:00 pm (UTC)I could never get into Outlander. I did make it through the first of the Lord John books, but Gabaldon's prose just fails to engage me for some reason. :\
(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-06 07:22 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-06 07:27 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-06 07:42 pm (UTC)Blast from the Past in a way fits (Brendan Fraser again). Hugh Jackman and Meg Ryan in that easily imdb-able movie did the forwards-from-past-time thing that most commenters here seem to rec, so I mention it as well. As does nearly every TV series at some point.
I don't get why you dislike Funke and Fforde yet love Lost in Austen.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-06 07:58 pm (UTC)I kind of am hoping for ones where it's the main story? That seems tougher, though!
Man, Brendan gets around! I remember that movie being pretty blah. And that Jackman/Ryan movie...*struggles to remember name* That was pretty bad. :( Though I find it funny that the original version apparently had an incest B-plot that nobody caught until after some preview screenings. Oh, Hollywood.
Funke I didn't read enough of to really comment on—I just got very bored, very quickly. I have been meaning to give her another chance, though. As for Fforde, I just don't think he's a very good writer. I've read all of the books in the series except for the most recent, and they're just very...flat. The characters are kind of wooden, and though there's a lot of creativity to the books, to me they're presented entirely without verve. Lost in Austen at least had spunk. I found it involving in ways I never did the Thursday Next books.
Of course, they're also different mediums. I think I'm probably more critical of flaws in prose fiction than I am of wobbles in a TV show.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-06 08:00 pm (UTC)I am never going to read Funke and don't like Fforde either, agree with you on flatness and waste of ideas, which is why I wondered why you would love LiA, which as you might have seen I loathe. Please tell me where all the characters end up in the end, I cannot watch it.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-06 08:30 pm (UTC)***MAJOR SPOILERS FOR LOST IN AUSTEN: LOOK AWAY IF YOU HAVEN'T SEEN IT BUT MAY WANT TO GET DRUNK AND DO SO***
Okay, so I don't know how far you got, but basically, a combination of Amanda's presence and Elizabeth's absence fuck everything up. Jane doesn't think Bingley loves her so she marries Collins, Charlotte goes to Africa to be a missionary, and though Amanda has sparkage with Darcy, she ruins it by admitting she's not a virgin, which is of course unacceptable. Bingley becomes a drunk and runs off—chastely but stupidly—with Lydia. Everyone rushes to try to stop Lydia from being ruined, including Wickham (who's an ass but not quite as bad a guy—Georgiana lied about what happened between them because she was in love with him and he refused her). Mr. Bennet impulsively challenges Bingley to a duel and badly injures himself in the process. Amanda's fear that he's dying is finally enough to get her back to the present/real world, only Darcy follows her. (The scenes of him in London looking utterly out of his depth were actually my favorite part, and likely the reason that I want people from the past in the present stories so badly.) Amanda and Darcy find Elizabeth, who's doing really well in 2008 and loves it and doesn't want to go back. But Amanda insists that the story needs to be put back the way it's supposed to be, and Elizabeth finally agrees out of concern for her father. He does indeed pull through and everything finally looks like it's slotting back into place—Darcy seems to have decided 2008 was just a bad dream, Amanda manages to bribe/convince Lady de Bourgh to get Jane's marriage to Collins annulled because it's not been consummated, and while Elizabeth and Darcy aren't exactly getting along, he's invited her to Pemberley. Amanda is on her way out the magic door when she finds a note Darcy left there saying he remembers everything. So both she and Elizabeth decide to pursue what they really want: Elizabeth is given her father's blessing to go back to the future, and Amanda goes to Pemberley in her place to make out with Darcy but never enjoy sushi or indoor plumbing again, which seems like a drawback to me, but I guess that's the price of love!
Phew! Okay, that was probably more detail than you needed, and yeah, written out like that, it sounds COMPLETELY FRICKIN' RIDICULOUS, and it is, but for whatever reason, it worked for me. *shrug* Sometimes things that certainly aren't great literature and aren't even great television appeal anyway. I say, thank god—we all need some guilty pleasures.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-06 10:04 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-06 08:13 pm (UTC)There's also a Tom Holt called Grailblazers though I think that just has the Knights of the Round Table survive until now. I'm sure I read another Arthurian one that was a bit more serious as well, but I can't remember much about it other than the newly awoken knights switching to motorbikes instead of horses, and possibly a descendant of Arthur? Argh, that's going to bug me now.
(And for a back-in-time one I'd rec another children's book: A Traveller in Time by Alison Uttley.)
(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-06 08:53 pm (UTC)Oh god, I love those books. I still re-read them for comfort, nearly fifty years after finding them.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-06 08:53 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-06 09:20 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-06 11:22 pm (UTC)replay. Replay!
Date: 2008-10-07 12:25 am (UTC)Re: replay. Replay!
Date: 2008-10-07 12:27 am (UTC)Sadly, that means I've already read it. :( But it rocks!
Re: replay. Replay!
Date: 2008-10-07 12:28 am (UTC)Re: replay. Replay!
Date: 2008-10-07 12:50 am (UTC)And you should watch "Life" if you aren't already. He's all, "how does this Internet thing work again?" and "look how tiny cell phones are!"
Re: replay. Replay!
Date: 2008-10-07 01:02 am (UTC)I'm glad I'm not the only one who found Time and Again boring. I've always been vaguely ashamed of that fact. :\
*adds another reason to my long list of reasons to finally watch Life*
Re: replay. Replay!
Date: 2008-10-07 08:42 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-07 02:01 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-07 03:02 am (UTC)The Sterkarm Handshake, by
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Sterkarm_Handshake
(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-07 07:17 am (UTC)Alexander Key
"The Sword of Aradel"
A Medieval boy and girl transport themselves 1000 years through time into modern New York City to find a magic sword.
It was written in 1977.
You might be able to inter-library it if you don't want to buy it. I've found a few of his books on Amazon used, and some off Ebay. Almost all are old Library copies.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-07 12:18 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-07 02:06 pm (UTC)Not quite what you're after, but good: Emma Tupper's Diary by Peter Dickinson.
Les Visiteurs (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0108500/), 1993.
The Planet of the Apes series comes close to fitting your criteria.
I know there are others, but I can't for the life of me think of them.
As for the meta-texts. Through the Looking Glass by Lewis Carroll is in the ballpark, as is Connie Willis's To Say Nothing of the Dog. Austen's own Northanger Abbey also comes close. Neverending Story by Michael Ende is fantastic and is right on the money, except that the story within the story is... the story. And quite a few of Diana Wynne Jones's also come close (eg. Fire and Hemlock, Homeward Bounders).
Again, I know there are more, but I can't think of them right now. Hopefully this will get you started anyway.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-07 10:20 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-07 11:49 pm (UTC)Austenland Shannon Hale.
Lost Memoirs of Jane Austen Syrie James
Confessions of a Jane Austen Addict Laurie Viera Rigler
Austen-inspired scifi you should read anywho:
The Magicians and Mrs. Quent Galen M. Beckett
and there's ages and ages of BAD Austen-inspired books (or just books that make me sad), like Mr. Darcy's Daughters and others whose authors I won't attempt to look up. I work in books, I shelve the fiction section, I see millions of books involving Darcy or Elizabeth.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-09 09:07 pm (UTC)