At least the scarecrow had straw

[trinityofone]

I suck. Like, a lot. I know I owe people comments and e-mails (blueandomlettes! God, I am so sorry); I also have three essays due increasingly soon, and all I have managed are crappy, not-even-outlines for two of them. But my brain is mush. Babyfood. Strained beets.

Some things that have managed to make me happy? Well, over at artword, the current challenge for artists is based on my fic Realm of Dryads, and slodwick and tardis80 have already made gorgeous posters/covers which you can see here and here. Guh. They're both amazingly-shivery-good. (Plus, the current artword challenge for writers is awesome, too. If I ever get my brain back, I must work on the little kernel of an idea I have for it.)

Also, cynicatlantis made this fabulous little comic that combines two of my favorite things and is adorable to boot. *happy sigh* I think I'll be clicking back to that a lot today.

Finally, because I seriously doubt that I will get anything useful done today, and because I've been boring-as-hell lately (I like to think that I'm boring when I don't post, and not the other way around. No need to shatter my illusions, mmkay?), I figure I'll offer to do comment drabbles again. Comment with a prompt, and I'll write you a drabble. Eventually. (Hey, I did ALL of them last time! I totally win!) And, er, I'm gonna limit it to SGA this time, 'cause I don't really feel like writing anything else.

Now back to pondering boysex...er, "The Rape of the Lock" and Joycean epiphanies.

Comments

Re: Lomonosov-Lavoisier

[trinityofone.livejournal.com]

Thank you! I love the universe, too, and I wish I could write more in it; I just need to get over the hump of both John and Lorne really not wanting to have the conversation they NEED to have. But I'm not abandoning it. Not at all. I'm glad you asked me to play.

Re: the icon, ciderpress made it for me. *loves it to pieces*

Re: Lomonosov-Lavoisier

[farwing.livejournal.com]

You have plans for more? Because this universe is fascinating and awesome. (And I just had a really awful thought- what if someone with the gene tried to commit suicide? Also, is there a limit to how many times the 'reboot' works?)

Re: Lomonosov-Lavoisier

[trinityofone.livejournal.com]

Thank you! And yeah, I do have plans for more--lots more, actually--but *flails* Stuff! Lots of stuff! In my way! Grr.

I hadn't really thought about the suicide thing, and, uh, probably should. I think it would depend on how they tried to do it. Not to get too graphic, but I think if someone went splat off the top of a tall building, the gene wouldn't do any good.

is there a limit to how many times the 'reboot' works?

No. But there are...side-effects. *is coy*

Re: Lomonosov-Lavoisier

[farwing.livejournal.com]

but I think if someone went splat off the top of a tall building, the gene wouldn't do any good.

Well, naturally. And if John had been blown to smithereens by the bomb in The Siege III his gene would have been pretty much useless.

Side effects? That sounds interesting