'300' update
Mar. 9th, 2007 09:54 amWell, you-know-what is coming out this weekend. I don't want to start a big thing again. But there are at least two things I feel the need to point out.
First, the movie has already sold out on Fandango. It's probably going to be big. Le sigh, you know? What can you do.
Second, however—second: this review has been posted on Slate. It backs up, almost point for point, everything I said in my review/rant/"delusional episode." I hope to see more reviews like this in the next few days.
And after that, it's up to the rest of the world to decide.
ETA: Poor Dana Stevens, who wrote the Slate review, is getting lots of hate in the comments too. *rolls eyes* You know, I like discussion, I don't mind disagreement, but I really fail to understand why people feel they have the right to be so damn rude.
(P.S. Thanks to everyone who offered congrats the other day on my decision to quit. I'm scared as hell right now and in danger of not being able to afford to eat anything but ramen for the foreseeable future, but I'm also really relieved, and all the support helps. Thanks, guys.)
First, the movie has already sold out on Fandango. It's probably going to be big. Le sigh, you know? What can you do.
Second, however—second: this review has been posted on Slate. It backs up, almost point for point, everything I said in my review/rant/"delusional episode." I hope to see more reviews like this in the next few days.
And after that, it's up to the rest of the world to decide.
ETA: Poor Dana Stevens, who wrote the Slate review, is getting lots of hate in the comments too. *rolls eyes* You know, I like discussion, I don't mind disagreement, but I really fail to understand why people feel they have the right to be so damn rude.
(P.S. Thanks to everyone who offered congrats the other day on my decision to quit. I'm scared as hell right now and in danger of not being able to afford to eat anything but ramen for the foreseeable future, but I'm also really relieved, and all the support helps. Thanks, guys.)
(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-09 05:57 pm (UTC)All the reviews I've seen and heard for this film have panned it. But ticket sales have been very, very strong. Maybe it'll be one of those films that does well its first weekend, then drops off hugely afterwards as word-of-mouth gets around.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-09 06:00 pm (UTC)Have you seen any other reviews like the Slate one, that bring up those issues? If they're out there, I'd like to make a collection...
(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-09 06:02 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-09 06:07 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-09 06:10 pm (UTC)Me: I'm not. (Sadly, he looked flabbergasted)
(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-09 08:55 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-09 06:11 pm (UTC)Just because it was a movie based on a comic based on another movie means that it couldn't have new subtext. At all.
Uh huh.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-09 06:16 pm (UTC)Just because it was a movie based on a comic based on another movie means that it couldn't have new subtext. At all.
Clearly, these are people who did not see Children of Men. Which is too bad, because it rocked. Violence and action and drama with a purpose! Whodathunk?
(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-09 06:15 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-09 06:19 pm (UTC)(What about protein, though? Does ramen have any?)
(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-09 06:30 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-09 06:36 pm (UTC)I shall look for those next time I go to Ralphs. Thanks! =)
(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-09 06:31 pm (UTC)Or learn to handle beans and chickpeas.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-09 06:40 pm (UTC)Maybe I'll start making huge batches of Roman Holiday (a family casserole) again and eating nothing else for a week.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-09 07:37 pm (UTC)I can send recipes if you're interested, and if not, no harm no foul! I am just a big proponent of the 'throw it into a big pot, let it cook, eat it for five days' method of being single :D
(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-09 07:44 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-10 12:07 am (UTC)http://diluvian.livejournal.com/295995.html
(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-09 06:39 pm (UTC)My mom always made me stir an egg into the ramen, right at the end of the cooking time, to add protein. If you beat the egg first, and then stir it really well when you drop it in the pot, the efffect is kind of like egg drop soup. I think it's quite tasty, but I usually get a lot of funny looks for it.
She also got me this book.
My mom, um, may have been a little concerned about the ramen habit I had in high school. (http://www.amazon.com/Book-Ramen-Lowcost-Gourmet-Instant/dp/1883385148/ref=pd_lpo_k2_dp_k2a_1_img/104-5215077-9895962)
(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-09 06:42 pm (UTC)That book looks hilarious—and helpful! I'll see if I can get it for free off BookMooch...
Thanks for the advice!
(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-09 06:44 pm (UTC)Also, is it wrong that the word Leonidas always makes me think of chocolate? I need chocolate now.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-09 06:49 pm (UTC)Every morning for breakfast my Dad has ramen noodles with bok choy, jalepeno and tofu. I add an egg after putting in the noodles, when done it's kinda like egg drop soup.
(I wish I knew the damn recipe, I've always made this by taste) Some tahini, mirin, soy sauce and a tiny bit of that red chile sauce that comes in a bottle with a rooseter on the side, mixed up with Ramen is very tasty. An egg whisked with soy sauce and chile on top is good too, plus adds protein.
Also quite tasty is sauteeing some onions, mushrooms and garlic and then adding a whisked egg, served on toast. Really tasty with tabasco sauce and cheese on top too.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-09 09:01 pm (UTC)Actually, pasta has protein, so the ramen should have some.
Hmm...
You may need to buy the occasional can of tuna.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-09 07:02 pm (UTC)(I trusted your analysis and description of the 300 then, so this is only icing on the cake! Good icing.)
(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-09 07:25 pm (UTC)So...want to get drinks one of these nights? (Poor Ray is being held hostage at the office all weekend long.)
(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-09 07:35 pm (UTC)I'd love to see you for drinks! I may have a panic attack on you, but not if you get me drunk first. *g*
(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-09 10:48 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-09 10:52 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-09 07:53 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-09 08:49 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-09 10:17 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-09 11:35 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-10 01:36 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-13 10:46 am (UTC)I also had a look at some other discussions, and as you mentioned (and experienced yourself), it's remarkable how rude some people are when it comes to defending this movie. I can understand if someone doesn't see (or chooses to ignore to see) that the movie transports a lot of questionable messages, but that doesn't mean he has to attack everybody else as stupid. (Personally, I only had a brief argument with one person who tried to convince me that it's just pure entertainment that stayed very civil. But then again, I just said that I don't want to see the movie anymore.)
You mention above that you want to collect other reviews that are also negative. When I have a look at your recent posts then I get the impression that at the moment you have other priorities, but if you're interested, just look at this collection of reviews (http://www.metacritic.com/film/titles/300). Most of them are in one way or another negative. Just their arguments differ, ranging from just a repetitive, badly acted movie to US propaganda and racist/misogynist to using Nazi/commercials aestetics, etc.