Why is SGA fandom so segregated?
Jul. 13th, 2006 11:36 amI am incredibly, incredibly tired today. I was exhausted yesterday, and couldn't even make it through The Daily Show before I crashed. This is bad. I thought I was adjusting to my new work schedule, but I guess I'm not. Is there any way to train yourself to need less sleep?
One thing that has almost kept me energized has been the response to the SGA Bulwer-Lytton Contest. There are so many awesome and hysterical entries, it's going to be killer to choose. So I think I'll pick my--15? Is that how many entries an LJ poll allows?--my 15 or so favorites and let people vote on the Grand Prize Winner. Unless anybody has wild objections, I'll put that up tomorrow.
Like I said, the response has been incredible, and I've seen some new names (by which I mean: people I don't know, even by association, not "people who don't usually comment here"), which is always cool. But--and please correct me if I'm wrong--I still seem to be attracting mostly McKay/Sheppard people, or at least mostly slash people. Which in general makes sense, because hey, I write McKay/Sheppard, I talk about McKay/Sheppard, most of my friends are into McKay/Sheppard. As far as I'm concerned, McKay/Sheppard is for yay.
BUT. I like other pairings, too (my other fandom interest could possibly be described as McKay/women), and I think at least a little cross-pairing pollination is to be encouraged. My last fandom was BtVS/AtS, and it was wild, man. I mean, I started out a Spuffy shipper (Shut up! Their love was
Why is SGA so much more segregated? I mean, I don't think this is entirely a bad thing--I don't want my flist flooded with Sheppard/Weir stories, and I doubt the Sheppard/Weir shippers want a gazillion McKay/Sheppard stories on their friends pages, either. But is it just me, or is it extremely hard to organize activities that include all sides of fandom? Take
(Speaking of one nice bit of pairing diversity, I really loved this
Anyway, the Bulwer-Lytton thing is different, because of course it is not pairing-centric: it's mostly about mocking style and usage, although certain tropes have been fun to mock, too. It's about bad writing, but it's also about amusing and clever writing, and seeing what you can do in the space of a sentence. That's something everybody can appreciate, right?
So I guess what I'm wondering is, where are the het shippers? (Again, please correct me if they're around and I've just been too dumb to notice.) And I just don't mean, why aren't they here, responding to this--what is here is awesome, and I'm not like, demanding more people participate, omg. I just mean, I've been in this fandom for almost a year now--how have we managed not to interact at all? Of course, part of this may be me--I'm certainly not trolling
Maybe it's just that we have a situation that's more like X-Files fandom than Buffydom. Back in the old days, I was rabid about MSR, and I just didn't go anywhere near the slash. (Or Scully/Skinner, or whatever else there was.) I can't remember very well, but I think I was actively afraid of those unfamiliar corners of the net, and that included any of the projects "those people" may have been involved in. Of course, I think this may have had MUCH more to do with the fact that I was 14 than with my shipping preferences, but could there possibly be some connection? What I'd like to know is, do most people on the het end of fandom see even a name associated with slash and immediately go, "Avoid! Avoid! Avoid!"? Which, I hasten to say, would be totally their right. But I realize, I don't even know anyone over there that I could ask.
I'm not saying that there needs to be some sort of cross-ship dialogue, because I think those things tend to end in angry glaring at best. Possibly, just ignoring each other is the best way to avoid conflict, and I'm all for avoiding conflict. I'm just surprised there isn't some sort of neutral zone, some shaded area at the center of the Giant Venn Diagram of Fandom Life. Why do you think that is?
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-14 02:03 am (UTC)I also think that the nature of the shows themselves contribute to the differences in interaction between groups of fans. In BtVS/ ATS, there was so *much* going on in canon that people had a lot to talk about that wasn't pairing-related, and I think people got to know each other through those discussions (for good or bad!) so that they'd read fic that wasn't *their* pairing because they knew the writer. In SGA, it seems, there's a deal less meta-discussion (or it is mainly pairing-focused) so the opportunity to meet people with other interests is necessarily limited.
I think that also led people to write more fic that explored non-pairing issues in BtVS, at least for a while; SGA writers deal with enormously complex issues but a lot of it is viewed through the lens of the pairing. Which works, given that we know so little about some of them that they make good projection screens!
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-14 03:43 am (UTC)Yes, yes, I totally agree. And stress that I don't think -- or think you think -- that that is something negatively reflecting on SGA. They're two entirely different shows, or even types of shows. I love SGA and occasionally they delve into some complex and heady stuff -- but Joss wrote adult soap operas and there's just no way to compare the two. Hell, I wouldn't even classify Joss as Sci-fi, not even for Firefly. He wrote humans in fantastical settings. SGA is fantastical settings populated by humans.
SGA writers deal with enormously complex issues but a lot of it is viewed through the lens of the pairing
Yeah, that, too, rings true. Jossverse shows are introspective in ways SGA isn't, so when writing Jossverse you could kind of slip and slide your way into anything (and ditto about the following writers into different pairings/styles), where with SGA fanfic tends to focus a lot on the character simply because we get so little of it during canon. Hell, we know nothing about Shep's past. Nothing. What little we know about Rodney's came from SG-1.
Er. Yes. That was a very long-winded way of saying 'right on!' :)