I'm bored and currently have the intellectual prowess of a sulky tuna. So...let's play a game! Let's play two games! You can pick from either:
Marry, Shag, or Cliff
Wherein you give me the names of three persons, either fictional or real, and I tell you which one I would marry, which I'd shag once, and which I'd toss off a cliff. Then I'll respond with three choices for you.
~or~
Death Is Not an Option
Wherein you give me two names, again either fictional or real, and I have to tell you which one I would sleep with, provided that death is not an option. Then I'll respond with a pair for you.
You can ask other people who have commented, too. I'm totally in favor of the voyeuristic approach as well. Just: please, please help entertain me!
Marry, Shag, or Cliff
Wherein you give me the names of three persons, either fictional or real, and I tell you which one I would marry, which I'd shag once, and which I'd toss off a cliff. Then I'll respond with three choices for you.
~or~
Death Is Not an Option
Wherein you give me two names, again either fictional or real, and I have to tell you which one I would sleep with, provided that death is not an option. Then I'll respond with a pair for you.
You can ask other people who have commented, too. I'm totally in favor of the voyeuristic approach as well. Just: please, please help entertain me!
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-26 11:04 pm (UTC)I have figured out, though, that each has its advantages: the shagging-when-married version is particularly loathsome if you're being offered the kind of choices where you dislike all three people, whereas the no-shagging-when-married version is awfully frustrated when you're offered three good choices.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-26 11:09 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-26 11:15 pm (UTC)